From 7779a01d48626dc9e65976fb0c9099c0a12f9192 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Seth Hillbrand <seth@kipro-pcb.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 09:48:04 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] SIM_VALUE stores significants in 64-bit

stol isn't neccesarily 64-bit though, so we use stoll and catch the
overflow if we have bad input data

Fixes KICAD-2EF
---
 eeschema/sim/sim_value.cpp | 15 +++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/eeschema/sim/sim_value.cpp b/eeschema/sim/sim_value.cpp
index 118f40ec7b..7dc2350360 100644
--- a/eeschema/sim/sim_value.cpp
+++ b/eeschema/sim/sim_value.cpp
@@ -164,10 +164,17 @@ static inline void handleNodeForParse( tao::pegtl::parse_tree::node& aNode,
 
         for( const auto& subnode : aNode.children )
         {
-            if( subnode->is_type<SIM_VALUE_PARSER::intPart>() )
-                aParseResult.intPart = std::stol( subnode->string() );
-            else if( subnode->is_type<SIM_VALUE_PARSER::fracPart>() )
-                aParseResult.fracPart = std::stol( subnode->string() );
+            try
+            {
+                if( subnode->is_type<SIM_VALUE_PARSER::intPart>() )
+                    aParseResult.intPart = std::stoll( subnode->string() );
+                else if( subnode->is_type<SIM_VALUE_PARSER::fracPart>() )
+                    aParseResult.fracPart = std::stoll( subnode->string() );
+            }
+            catch( const std::exception& )
+            {
+                aParseResult.isOk = false;
+            }
         }
     }
     else if( aNode.is_type<SIM_VALUE_PARSER::exponent>() )