WIP task queue

This commit is contained in:
xenia 2020-05-02 04:17:37 -04:00
parent 3cf3db8db2
commit 89b3c817de
1 changed files with 110 additions and 0 deletions

110
private/taskq.rkt Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
#lang racket
(require db crypto racket/fasl)
(provide make-taskq taskq-close)
(struct taskq [dbname db stmts waiters lock] #:transparent)
(define STATE-QUEUED 0)
(define STATE-EXECUTING 1)
(define STATE-DONE 2)
(define TASKQ-INIT "create table taskq (id blob(16) primary key, task blob, state integer)")
(define (init-stmts c)
(hash
'delete-by-state (prepare c "delete from taskq where state=?")
'update-state-by-state (prepare c "update taskq set state=? where state=?")
'create (prepare c "insert into taskq (id, task, state) values (?, ?, ?)")
'update-state (prepare c "update taskq set state=? where id=? and state=?; select changes()")
'delete-by-id (prepare c "delete from taskq where id=?")
'get-first-by-state (prepare c "select * from taskq where state=? limit 1")))
(define (make-taskq path [initialize? #f])
(define c
(if initialize?
(sqlite3-connect #:database path #:mode 'create)
(sqlite3-connect #:database path)))
(when initialize?
(query-exec c TASKQ-INIT))
(define stmts (init-stmts c))
;; cleanup: if we crash and come back up, there might be done tasks and executing tasks
;; delete the done tasks, we don't have waiters for those anymore and any code that creates
;; waiters should check for the result it wanted and re-queue if needed
;; then, move executing tasks (which must have been interrupted by the crash) back to
;; queued so we can run them again
(query-exec c (hash-ref stmts 'delete-by-state) STATE-DONE)
(query-exec c (hash-ref stmts 'update-state-by-state) STATE-QUEUED STATE-EXECUTING)
(taskq path c stmts (make-hash) (make-semaphore 1)))
(define (taskq-close q)
(disconnect (taskq-db q)))
(define (update-waiters! q id)
;; ok basically fuck racket and its fucking "caveats concerning concurrent modification"
;; preemptive green threads are why we can't have nice things
;; it turns out in practice actually this probably won't be an issue ever but Just To Be Safe
;; we use a semaphore as a mutex protecting writes on taskq-waiters
(call-with-semaphore
(taskq-lock q)
(lambda ()
(hash-ref! (taskq-waiters q) id (make-semaphore)))))
(define (taskq-queue q what [num-retries 8] [retry-delay-secs 1/4])
(define id (crypto-random-bytes 16))
(with-handlers ([exn:fail:sql? (lambda (e)
(cond
[(zero? num-retries) (raise e)]
[else (sleep retry-delay-secs)
(taskq-queue q what (sub1 num-retries)
retry-delay-secs)]))])
(query-exec (taskq-db q) (hash-ref (taskq-stmts q) 'create)
id (s-exp->fasl what) STATE-QUEUED))
(define sema (update-waiters! q id))
(semaphore-wait sema))
;; blocks until the next task is available, then calls executor
(define (taskq-execute-next q executor)
;; this is a bad hack
;; use filesystem-change-evt to detect writes to the database
;; initialize the event first before query to avoid deadlock
(define evt (filesystem-change-evt (taskq-dbname q)))
(match (query-maybe-row (taskq-db q) (hash-ref (taskq-stmts q) 'get-first-by-state) STATE-QUEUED)
[#f (sync evt) (taskq-execute-next q executor)]
[(vector id task state)
(filesystem-change-evt-cancel evt)
;; update state, match expected existing state so that on concurrent modification, the query
;; fails and we retry with the next available row
(with-handlers ([exn:fail:sql? (lambda (_) (taskq-execute-next q executor))])
(when (zero?
(query-value (taskq-db q) (hash-ref (taskq-stmts q) 'update-state)
STATE-EXECUTING id state))
(taskq-execute-next q executor)))
;; now we have a unique lock to execute this row
(define (cleanup)
(query-exec (taskq-db q) (hash-ref (taskq-stmts q) 'update-state)
STATE-QUEUED id STATE-EXECUTING))
(with-handlers ([exn? (lambda (e) (cleanup) (raise e))])
(executor (fasl->s-exp task)))
(query-exec (taskq-db q) (hash-ref (taskq-stmts q) 'update-state)
STATE-DONE id STATE-EXECUTING)
(define sema (hash-ref (taskq-waiters q) id #f))
(unless (false? sema)
(semaphore-post sema))
(query-exec (taskq-db q) (hash-ref (taskq-stmts q) 'delete-by-id) id)]))
(define q (make-taskq "/tmp/s.sqlite3" #t))
(define (producer [n 0])
(printf "producing ~a\n" n)
(taskq-queue q n)
(sleep 1)
(producer (add1 n)))
(define (consumer)
(taskq-execute-next q (lambda (val) (printf "consuming ~a\n" val)
(sleep 2) (printf "done consuming\n")))
(consumer))
(thread producer)
(consumer)