* fix(large-video): do not show avatar if no url
By default the large video dominant speaker avatar
has an empty src, which will result in a broken
image displaying. There is also disconnect with
non-react code trying to set an undefined src.
To prevent such until local avatar generation
work is done in the future, just don't show the
avatar.
* fix(conference): set the room instance earlier
Set the room instance on APP.conference before triggering
a redux update of the conference being set,, because
middleware can then fire and call methods on APP.conference
that depend on the room being set.
* get local participant directly from store instead of from global
The instance variable is not accurate. By default isVisible is
set to false but nothing sets the video container to actually
not be visible. As such it is possible for the video element
itself to autoplay, thereby making video visible, while the
isVisible boolean is still false. The fix chosen is to remove
instance variable and always respect calls to show/hide so
that the video container can be set to hidden.
To reduce the amount of motion that has to be blurred, use a canvas
to essentially set the FPS of the video background. This canvas
component is behind a temporary feature flag, as well as being able
to disable the blur, so it can be played around with on deployed
environments.
The animation for toggling filmstrip visibility was lagging on
Safari. Even though the background video is set to hidden, it is
still causing issues. Setting the background to display none
instead does help but might interfere with animations. So instead
do the easy thing and re-use logic used for Firefox to not show
the background video.
* ref(large-video): reactify background
This is pre-requisite work for disabling the background on
certain browsers, namely Firefox. By moving the component
to react, and in general encapsulating background logic,
selectively disabling the background will be easier.
The component was left for LargeVideo to update so it can
continue to coordinate update timing with the actual large
video display. If the background were moved completely into
react and redux with LargeVideo, then background updates would
occur before large video updates causing visual jank.
* fix(large-video): do not show background for Firefox and temasys
Firefox has performance issues with adding filter effects on
animated elements. On temasys, the background videos weren't
really displaying anyway.
* some props refactoring
Instead of passing in classes to LargeVideoBackground, rely on
explicit props. At some point LargeVideo will have to be reactified
and the relationsihp between it and LargeVideoBackground might
change, so for now make use of props to be explicit about
how LargeVideoBackground can be modified.
Also, set the jitsiTrack to display on LargeVideoBackground to
null if the background is not displayed. This was an existing
optimization, although previously done with pausing and playing.
* squash: use newly exposed RTCBrowserType
* squash: rebase and use new lib browser util
* squash: move hiding logic all into LargeVideo
* squash: remove hiding of background on stream change. hopefully doesnt break anything
- Modify Etherpad and SharedVideo so their resizing takes into account
the width of the filmstrip in vertical filmstrip mode.
- Modify Filmstrip's getFilmstripWidth to account for when the filmstrip
is hidden.
- modify VideoContainer so in vertical filmstrip mode it centers the
shared desktop stream in the middle of the available space not taken
by filmstrip.
- Also allow clickthrough on the secondary toolbar itself while still
allowing clicks on the toolbar's buttons. This allows clicks on
shared videos to go through.
ESLint 4.8.0 discovers a lot of error related to formatting. While I
tried to fix as many of them as possible, a portion of them actually go
against our coding style. In such a case, I've disabled the indent rule
which effectively leaves it as it was before ESLint 4.8.0.
Additionally, remove jshint because it's becoming a nuisance with its
lack of understanding of ES2015+.
* feat(presence): display status in thumbnail and large video
- Create a React Component for displaying presence. It currently
connects to the store for participant updates but in the future
should not be as smart once more reactification occurs.
- Modify filmstrip css so the presence status displays horizontal
center and below the avatar.
- Modify videolayout css so the presence status displays horizontal
centered and with a rounded background.
- Dispatch presence updates so the participant state can be update.
- Update message position on large video update to ensure message
positioning is correct.
* squash: do not show presence message if connection message is displayed
The container needs to store user's ID in order for the 'isOnLargeVideo'
logic to work correctly when user has no stream (previously it was
obtained from stream which can be null/undefined).
When using onplay in firefox, the event fires before data is flowing,
which can cause videoHeight and videoWidth to be 0 during resizing.
By using onplaying, there is some assurance data is being received,
so videoHeight and videoWidth should be set.
We seemed to be using the names "film strip" and "filmstrip" (and,
consequently, their source code-conscious forms such as film-strip,
FilmStrip, etc.) In order to comply with our coding style which requires
a consistent one name for a given abstraction, choose one name and
rename the uses of the other name.
Wikipedia has a definition of a "filmstrip", I couldn't find a "film
strip". I guess our abstraction can be seen as what's described there.
When I google "film strip", I get results about "filmstrip" at the top.
That's why I chose "filmstrip".
Certain uses of "film strip" such as interfaceConfig.filmStripOnly and
in the external API I left untouched in an attempt to preserve
compatibility.
I wasn't sure whether CSS was tangled in compatibility so I made a
choice and renamed there was well.
Grey filter will be applied to the remote video/avatar displayed on
"large" and a message indicating remote connectivity issues will be
shown on top of that.
VideoContainer is a separate being which implements the LargeContainer
and it's confusing to have it in the same file. This was encouraging to
access private parts of the VideoContainer directly(not through
the interface).