* Adds an option to disable features based on token data.
Reverts changes from b84e910086, removes disableDesktopSharing option and an interface_config option.
* Disable recording button based on token features data.
Hide recording if local participant isGuest and roles based on token.
When enableUserRolesBasedOnToken is enabled we were not hiding the record button for guests.
* Adds filtering of jibri iqs and rayo based on features.
Moves feature checking in separate utility function.
Renames utility method.
* Adds a footer text when outbound-call is not feature enabled.
* Fixes comments.
The commit message of "Associate remote participant w/ JitsiConference
(_JOINED)" explains the motivation for this commit.
Practically, _JOINED and _LEFT combined with "Remove remote participants
who are no longer of interest" should alleviate the problem with
multiplying remote participants to an acceptable level of annoyance.
Technically though, a remote participant cannot be identified by an ID
only. The ID is (somewhat) "unique" in the context of a single
JitsiConference instance. So in order to not have to scratch our heads
over an obscure corner, racing case, it's better to always identify
remote participants by the pair id-conference. Unfortunately, that's a
bit of a high order given the existing source code. So I've implemented
the cases which are the easiest so that new source code written with
participantUpdated is more likely to identify a remote participant with
the pair id-conference.
Additionally, the commit "Reduce direct read access to the
features/base/participants redux state" brings more control back to the
functions of the feature base/participants so that one day we can (if we
choose to) do something like, for example:
If getParticipants is called with a conference, it returns the
participants from features/base/participants who are associated with the
specified conference. If no conference is specified in the function
call, then default to the conference which is the primary focus of the
app at the time of the function call. Added to the above, this should
allow us to further reduce the cases in which we're identifying remote
participants by id only and get us even closer to a more "predictable"
behavior in corner, racing cases.
Recently/as part of the work on taking into account the user defined by
JWT, the local participant (on mobile) started telling the remote
participants that he/she had the display name "me". Obviously, that's
incorrect. Do not store the default display name in redux. While it may
be argues that redux is the place for all states, base/participants and
the name property of Participant is not meant to be that display name
because that is being sent to remote participants, the default name
needs to be internationalized, etc. So it's better to not store the
default display name at this time at all because it's not used by mobile
anyway and Web already deals with remote participants who don't share
their display names.
Will override email, display name and avatar URL with the values
provided in 'context.user' structure of the JWT token.
Settings will no longer be used to retrieve local display name,
email and avatar URL. Now those values will be obtained from
the /features/base/participants Redux state.
fix(jwt/middleware): use const for default name
fix: wrong default display name on web
ref(base/participants): remove getDisplayName functions
ref(jwt): do not accept unknown user fields
hristoterezov
Дамян Минков
Lyubo Marinov
Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
yanas
paweldomas