clearance record improvements
This commit is contained in:
parent
ffca523980
commit
07a39a0397
|
@ -983,45 +983,65 @@ void SPECCTRA_DB::FromBOARD( BOARD* aBoard ) throw( IOError )
|
|||
int curTrackWidth = aBoard->m_BoardSettings->m_CurrentTrackWidth;
|
||||
int curTrackClear = aBoard->m_BoardSettings->m_TrackClearence;
|
||||
|
||||
// The +5 is to give freerouter a little extra room, this is 0.5 mils.
|
||||
// The 0.5 is to give freerouter a little extra room, this is 0.5 mils.
|
||||
// If we export without this, then on import freerouter violates our
|
||||
// DRC checks with track to via spacing, although this could be a
|
||||
// result of > testing vs. >= testing in PCBNEW's DRC.
|
||||
double clearance = scale(curTrackClear+5);
|
||||
// double safetyMargin = 0.5;
|
||||
|
||||
// recent freerouter code adds .1 to the requested clearances, and I want .5
|
||||
// so subtract .1 so we actually get 0.5.
|
||||
double safetyMargin = 0.4;
|
||||
|
||||
double clearance = scale(curTrackClear);
|
||||
|
||||
STRINGS& rules = pcb->structure->rules->rules;
|
||||
|
||||
sprintf( rule, "(width %.6g)", scale( curTrackWidth ) );
|
||||
rules.push_back( rule );
|
||||
|
||||
sprintf( rule, "(clearance %.6g)", clearance );
|
||||
sprintf( rule, "(clearance %.6g)", clearance+safetyMargin );
|
||||
rules.push_back( rule );
|
||||
|
||||
// On a high density board, a typical solder mask clearance will be 2-3 mils.
|
||||
// This exposes 2 to 3 mils of bare board around each pad. So we need at least
|
||||
// 2 mils *extra* clearance for tracks which would come near a pad on
|
||||
// a different net. So if the baseline trace to trace clearance was say 4 mils, then
|
||||
// the SMD to track clearance should be at least 6 mils. Then, because
|
||||
// freerouter seems to be off about a 1/2 mil on clearance tests, add
|
||||
// another .5 mil for this test discrepancy as a safety margin.
|
||||
sprintf( rule, "(clearance %.6g (type default_smd))", clearance + safetyMargin + 2.0 );
|
||||
rules.push_back( rule );
|
||||
|
||||
/* see: http://www.freerouting.net/usren/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=339#p474
|
||||
sprintf( rule, "(clearance %.6g (type pad_to_turn_gap))", clearance );
|
||||
sprintf( rule, "(clearance %.6g (type pad_to_turn_gap))", clearance + safetyMargin );
|
||||
rules.push_back( rule );
|
||||
|
||||
sprintf( rule, "(clearance %.6g (type smd_to_turn_gap))", clearance );
|
||||
sprintf( rule, "(clearance %.6g (type smd_to_turn_gap))", clearance + safetyMargin );
|
||||
rules.push_back( rule );
|
||||
|
||||
sprintf( rule, "(clearance %.6g (type via_via))", clearance );
|
||||
sprintf( rule, "(clearance %.6g (type via_via))", clearance + safetyMargin );
|
||||
rules.push_back( rule );
|
||||
|
||||
sprintf( rule, "(clearance %.6g (type via_smd))", clearance );
|
||||
sprintf( rule, "(clearance %.6g (type via_smd))", clearance + safetyMargin );
|
||||
rules.push_back( rule );
|
||||
|
||||
sprintf( rule, "(clearance %.6g (type via_pin))", clearance );
|
||||
sprintf( rule, "(clearance %.6g (type via_pin))", clearance + safetyMargin );
|
||||
rules.push_back( rule );
|
||||
|
||||
sprintf( rule, "(clearance %.6g (type pin_pin))", clearance );
|
||||
sprintf( rule, "(clearance %.6g (type pin_pin))", clearance + safetyMargin );
|
||||
rules.push_back( rule );
|
||||
|
||||
sprintf( rule, "(clearance %.6g (type smd_pin))", clearance );
|
||||
sprintf( rule, "(clearance %.6g (type smd_pin))", clearance + safetyMargin );
|
||||
rules.push_back( rule );
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
// well, the user is going to text edit these in the DSN file anyway,
|
||||
// at least until we have an export dialog.
|
||||
|
||||
// Pad to pad spacing on a single SMT part can be closer than our
|
||||
// clearance, we don't want freerouter complaining about that, so
|
||||
// output a significantly smaller pad to pad clearance to freerouter.
|
||||
clearance = scale(curTrackClear)/4;
|
||||
|
||||
sprintf( rule, "(clearance %.6g (type smd_smd))", clearance );
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue