Don't let zone cutout on different layer confuse us about intersections.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/kicad/code/kicad/issues/10583
This commit is contained in:
parent
091055fa1d
commit
3c5ae6d317
|
@ -106,16 +106,21 @@ bool DRC_TEST_PROVIDER_ZONE_CONNECTIONS::Run()
|
|||
if( m_drcEngine->IsErrorLimitExceeded( DRCE_STARVED_THERMAL ) )
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
// Quick test for "connected":
|
||||
// Quick tests for "connected":
|
||||
//
|
||||
if( !pad->FlashLayer( layer ) )
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if( pad->GetNetCode() != zone->GetNetCode() || pad->GetNetCode() <= 0 )
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
// More thorough test for "connected", but still not layer-specific:
|
||||
const KICAD_T type_zone[] = { PCB_ZONE_T, EOT };
|
||||
EDA_RECT item_boundingbox = pad->GetBoundingBox();
|
||||
|
||||
if( !alg::contains( connectivity->GetConnectedItems( pad, type_zone ), zone ) )
|
||||
if( !item_boundingbox.Intersects( zone->GetCachedBoundingBox() ) )
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
// If those passed, do a thorough test:
|
||||
//
|
||||
constraint = bds.m_DRCEngine->EvalZoneConnection( pad, zone, layer );
|
||||
ZONE_CONNECTION conn = constraint.m_ZoneConnection;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -142,10 +147,12 @@ bool DRC_TEST_PROVIDER_ZONE_CONNECTIONS::Run()
|
|||
|
||||
spokes += intersections.size() / 2;
|
||||
|
||||
// This is our final "connected" test.
|
||||
if( spokes <= 0 )
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
// Now we know we're connected, so see if there are any other manual spokes
|
||||
// added:
|
||||
//
|
||||
for( PCB_TRACK* track : connectivity->GetConnectedTracks( pad ) )
|
||||
{
|
||||
if( padOutline.PointInside( track->GetStart() ) )
|
||||
|
@ -160,6 +167,8 @@ bool DRC_TEST_PROVIDER_ZONE_CONNECTIONS::Run()
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// And finally report it if there aren't enough:
|
||||
//
|
||||
if( spokes < minCount )
|
||||
{
|
||||
std::shared_ptr<DRC_ITEM> drce = DRC_ITEM::Create( DRCE_STARVED_THERMAL );
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue