The test_case_template.hpp header is deprecated in Boost, and the
latest Boost version is now throwing warnings during the build.
In Boost 1.59 (at least), this header is included transitively by the main
Boost test header, so this header is not needed by any supported Boost
version.
The InOutString function is not really useful, in most cases it can
be done more simple with string operator+. This function is causing
issues on MSVC (perhaps the template param names) anyway.
By making the caller use the "namespace" keyword, the formatter
is given the right indentation hints.
Also makes it clearer synatactically. One day, this will be a
namespace alias (needs GCC 7).
This adds a few tests on:
* LIB_PART
* SCH_PIN
* SCH_SHEET
* SCH_SHEET_PATH
These tests exercise some of the basic code paths in these classes
and show some of the expected behaviours.
None of these tests are particularly ground-breaking, but they
provide a starting point to build out further tests, and to ensure
the already-covered behaviour is stable.
It does expose some places where SCH_SHEET could probably use const.
Before Boost 1.64, there was no test logging function
for std::nullptr_t.
Add a logging struct to Boost to deal with this, and some
macros to assist in similar cases. These macros are bit
untidy-looking, but due to GCC bug #56480, we can't use
namespace aliasing to solve this. From Boost 1.64 onwards,
these namespaces are not needed at all.
Remove some code added to work around lack of nullptr printing
in the past.
These macros, and the nullptr printer, can be removed when
the Boost min version is 1.64 or greater.
The geometry and numbering logic is separate to the dialog, and
can be separated for clearer logic and better testability.
Moreover, refactor it to avoid any dependency on pcbnew
classes, so it can be move to common for potential re-use in
eeschema and friends in future.
Also convert all wxPoint logic in these classes to VECTOR2I and
fix some function visibilities.
Add some unit tests of the ARRAY_OPTIONS geometry and numbering.
Introduce the concept of a DRC_PROVIDER which allows
to separate the various DRC functions to their own
areas. This allows, amongst other things, a slimmer core
DRC class, and allows DRC functions to be separately testable.
The courtyard DRCs (overlap, missing and malformed)
are the first victims, so instrumentation can be added to this function.
Add some unit tests on this DRC function, as well a few re-usable PCB-based
utility functions in a library (qa_pcbnew_utils) that could be shared between
unit tests and other utilities.
An unhappy conjunction of GCC bug #56480 [1] and Boost having
different namespaces for the print_log_value make it quite
ugly to support this method.
For the limited purposes of the unit tests, a free function in
the unit_test_utils header (in the absence of any implementation
in the main libraries) will do, even if it is a little intrusive.
From Boost 1.64 onwards, the customisation point boost_test_print_type
is avaiable, and anyt print functions should be transitioned over to
that method when the minimum Boost version is 1.64 or higher.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56480
Test a few "centre-point-angle" cases and add some
generic geom code for testing vectors and boxes are within
tolerance (since rounding often creeps in).
Much of the arc-checking code will be useful to other
construction methods (e.g. point-point-point).
There are expected failures for the bbox code when
the arc passes though, but does not end on, a quadrant point
(0, 90, 180, 270). This is due to a defective
implementation of SHAPE_ARC::BBox() that does not take
into account the quadrant points. This will be fixed
as a follow-up.
Some functions aren't defined on Boost < 1.59, which is
sadly inclusive of the Ubuntu LTSs.
Make some guards so you can still use these on the newer
Boosts with some useful fallback where possible.
This includes:
* Linkage against the Boost unit test libs
* Configuration of the Boost libs
* A place for common generics "extras" for unit test harnesses
including
* A simple way to allow "expected-failure" tests (without
breaking Boost < 1.58, e.g. Ubuntu LTS)
* Moving some simple numeric predicates from the geom tests
to the utils library.
Expand unit test docs to describe the expected failures macro.
Add a few COLOR4D tests, including one with expected failures due
to a pre-existing bug. This will be fixed in a follow-up commit.
John Beard
jean-pierre charras