Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Gilles Cornu 8caed8ea16 Merge pull request #7918 from mitchellh/gildegoma/fix-7195
Add `config_file` option to both Ansible provisioners
2016-11-15 08:29:30 +01:00
Gilles Cornu 1de9f2228d
provisioners/ansible: Fix a mistake in a unit test 2016-11-13 21:00:58 +01:00
Gilles Cornu a842abbc38
provisioners/ansible(both): Add config_file option
With this new option defined, the `ansible-galaxy` and
`ansible-playbook` commands generated by the Ansible provisioners will
be executed with the ANSIBLE_CONFIG environment variable set
accordingly.

Resolve GH-7195

This commit also fix the following open issues:
- Implement the pending RSpec examples about path existence checks
  performed by the ansible (remote) provisioner.
- In verbose mode, the ansible remote provisioner now correctly displays
  the Ansible Galaxy parameters ("role_file" and "roles_path") with
  single quotes (which is safer for potential copy-paste usage).

Additional Notes:
- Test coverage for `ansible_local` provisioner is still not
  implemented. See GH-6633.
- Test coverage for galaxy from host is not implemented yet (due to
  general issue with mocking both command executions, see
  https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant/pull/6529#r45278451
2016-10-22 01:09:12 +02:00
Daniel Gonzalez 58f2b0c8c7 Make ansible-playbook command configurable
The ansible-playbook command is currently hardcoded for the ansible and
ansible_local provisioners. This patch adds the config option
playbook_command to allow the user to change the command.
2016-10-09 20:48:50 +02:00
Gilles Cornu a7ee56459b provisioners/ansible(both): fix ansible config files presence checks
With this change, the presence of Ansible configuration files (like
playbook file, inventory path, galaxy role file, etc.) is no longer
performed by the `config` classes, but by the `provisioner` classes
(at the beginning of the provision command).

This change fixes several issues:

- Resolve #6984 as `provision` method are only executed when remote
  (ssh) communication with the guest machine is possible.
- Resolve #6763 in a better way than 4e451c6 initially did.
- Improve the general provisioner speed since the `config` checks are
  actually triggered by many vagrant actions (e.g. `destroy`,...), and
  can also be triggered multiple times during a vagrant run (e.g. on
  callback request made by the machine provider).

Unlike the former `config`-based checks, the provision action won't
collect all the invalid options, but only report the first invalid
option found and abort the execution.

Some unit tests were not implemented yet to save my scarce "open source
contribution time" for other important issues, but they should be done
at last via GH-6633.
2016-06-01 06:40:23 +02:00
Gilles Cornu 8190fba872 provisoners/ansible: improve config test coverage
Changes:

- Add "config" unit tests for `ansible_local` (guest)
- Share some "config" examples between both ansible provisioners
- Move `config_host.rb` specific examples to `config/host.rb`
- Add a requirement to "../helpers" in `config/guest.rb` in order to be
  able to run the related unit tests

References:

- This is the first part of GH-6633 resolution
- This change is a handy prerequisite for GH-6570

Not addressed yet:

- FIXME (guest.rb): Some test-double stubs are currently not working as
  expected, and the related checks are commented out for the moment
  (no idea why, but this is not urgent to be fixed because of GH-7335
  rejection. See also GH-6984)
- FIXME (shared.rb): The guest-based config should actually NOT return
  an error when the extra_vars file cannot be found, but only display a
  a warning (similarly to the changes done for GH-6763, see 4e451c6)
2016-05-29 17:01:37 +02:00
Renamed from test/unit/plugins/provisioners/ansible/config_test.rb (Browse further)