adiv5: Revert f010a56
as it makes bad assumptions about APs that use the same base address
This commit is contained in:
parent
e59ebb0e1d
commit
cfa9e9858d
|
@ -833,7 +833,6 @@ void adiv5_dp_init(ADIv5_DP_t *dp, const uint32_t idcode)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Probe for APs on this DP */
|
||||
uint32_t last_base = 0;
|
||||
size_t invalid_aps = 0;
|
||||
dp->refcnt++;
|
||||
for (size_t i = 0; i < 256 && invalid_aps < 8; ++i) {
|
||||
|
@ -855,18 +854,6 @@ void adiv5_dp_init(ADIv5_DP_t *dp, const uint32_t idcode)
|
|||
}
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (ap->base == last_base) {
|
||||
DEBUG_WARN("AP %d: Duplicate base\n", i);
|
||||
#if PC_HOSTED == 1
|
||||
if (dp->ap_cleanup)
|
||||
dp->ap_cleanup(i);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
adiv5_ap_unref(ap);
|
||||
adiv5_dp_unref(dp);
|
||||
/* FIXME: Should we expect valid APs behind duplicate ones? */
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
last_base = ap->base;
|
||||
|
||||
kinetis_mdm_probe(ap);
|
||||
nrf51_mdm_probe(ap);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue