Substantial elements following a divot should be at least as far in each
cardinal direction from the origin point in order to be considered
substantial. This catches cases where the "substantial" element is
actually a straight segment away from the divot
Fixes https://gitlab.com/kicad/code/kicad/issues/14130
Fractured polygons are always fractured along the x-axis, so when
checking to see if a segment is a fracture point, we check if the y
coordinate is equal. This avoids situations where there are multiple
fracture points between two inflection points
Additionally, we add a second check to ensure we don't hit spurious
blobs (all kinks should be symmetric and therefore be substantial in
each direction)
Fixes https://gitlab.com/kicad/code/kicad/issues/14130
Fixes#12580
Additionally does not export no_connect netlist annotation on pins
which are both connected to another pin and a NC item, unless all
connected pins are stacked at the symbol level.
Adds testing of pin types to netlist QA unit tests.
Fixes#10926
Contains the following changes:
- Adds a new ERC_SCH_PIN_CONTEXT class which is used to provide deterministic
comparison between items causing ERC violations (e.g. pins) when associated
with a SCH_SHEET_PATH context.
- Adds association of SCH_SHEET_PATHs for ERC_ITEMs and the sub-schematic items
which caused an ERC violation. This allows correct display of markers on the
sheets of interest only, and allows correct naming resolution and cross-probing
from the ERC dialog.
- Adds a new ERC_TREE_MODEL class, derived from RC_TREE_MODEL, which correctly
resolves component references across heirarchical sheets using the associated
SCH_SHEET_PATHs. This allows sheet-specific component references to be displayed
correctly in the ERC results tree.
- Updates SCH_MARKER to only draw sheet-specific markers on the sheet causing
an ERC violation.
- Increments the schematic file version.
- When loading a schematic with legacy ERC exclusions, discards those of type
ERCE_PIN_TO_PIN_WARNING, ERCE_PIN_TO_PIN_ERROR, ERCE_HIERACHICAL_LABEL, and
ERCE_DIFFERENT_UNIT_NET as there is no safe way to automatically infer the
information which is now stored with these exclusions (sheet paths for error
location and related items). Requiring users to (once) re-add exclusions is
preferable to silently incorrectly matching new ERC issues to legacy exclusions.
Same pin name != same net name unless the pins are explicitly connected
Also add pin number to all unconnected pads ensuring they have unique
nets
Fixes https://gitlab.com/kicad/code/kicad/issues/13236
Seth Hillbrand
Roberto Fernandez Bautista
Jeff Young
JamesJCode
Mike Williams
jean-pierre charras
Jon Evans
Barabas Raffai
Mikolaj Wielgus
Tomasz Wlostowski